- This topic is empty.
-
AuthorPosts
-
PookztAMemberi did something like this last summer at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, except we used real heads of cadavers. they had tons of buckets full of heads soaking in preservative / fixative, and we would open the buckets and pick out a fresh head of our choice (two students per head, 6 total students did the trip), then we would work together to remove the scalp, scrape off the outer layer of the periosteum, drill through the skull to remove the calvarium and expose the brain, then carefully clean the meninges off the brain to expose the underlying vasculature which had been injected with brightly colored silicon and latex dies so that we could study how the brain's gyri are perfused and by what vessels and by what specific branches. it was even more fun than viewing live neurosurgical operations, because it was so hands-on. this video vividly reminds me of that experience, and how lucky I am to have had it, so thanks for posting this.
cool article, thanks for posting
PauldoMemberaww Abe…you forgot to ask what this video about neurosurgery training has to do with?
NOTHING! There is no relation between the two topics and they should NEVER be mixed. Got it?
And it's lame sauce man to try to give your pet personal beliefs any validity via your chosen profession.
PauldoMemberhttp://www.hulu.com/watch/175691/secrets-of-your-mind-thu-sep-2-2010
Another news video show on neurosurgeons. This one follows patients and surgeons throughout live procedures and after care. Toughest one to watch was the reconstruction of a 3 month old's forehead. This other surgery the surgeon popped this ladies aneurysm, he had 180 seconds before she bled out and he stopped the bleeding in 58 seconds. That takes nerves of steel! All of the surgeons they interviewed and followed all shared a lot of the same traits…completely self-assured, total confidence, complete avoidance of any possibility of being wrong. Great traits to have when doing neurosurgery, maybe not so great when addressing personal beliefs.
PookztAMemberPauldo,
Shame on you for continually bringing up 9/11 despite the fact that this forum's moderators have politely asked us to not talk about it. Due to the fact that you keep pushing on me, I will make a few quick points for you to think about, but I will not participate in any major discussion about this topic due to the requests of the Chilluminati admnistrators. I am making this post because you have repeatedly brought up this topic and I am tired of being bashed by you in public, so I am going to now defend myself, and then leave you to think about my response without replying to any more of yours. Again, this is a defensive post, not an opportunity for you to try and discuss 9/11 with me. If you wish to discuss this, please just email me.
I am proud to remind you that my beliefs, although much different than yours, are strongly evidence-based, and those are the only strong beliefs I hold. Yes, I went through a short period of gullability after finally realizing that I had blindly believed in the corporate media's version of the events for so long, but thanks to you and many others, I was brought back down to 'reality', and shown that evidence is the only thing which should formulate strong beliefs, especially considering the fact that I will someday be in charge of saving peoples' lives. Any other weaker beliefs I have are more “ponderings” or “beliefs in possibility” or “theories”. For example, I strongly believe that Osama Bin Laden did not commit 9/11, and I also strongly believe that large airliners did not crash into the towers on 9/11. (here are a few things you should consider. First of all, Osama Bin Laden is not listed as ‘wanted for 9/11’ on the FBIs official website. Why is this? He is clearly listed as wanted for a previous crime of 1998, so why is he not also listed as wanted for 9/11? Look: http://www.fbi.gov/wanted/topten/fugitives/laden.htm Secondly, at the following link, you will get to see an official CIA transcript of Osama Bin Laden’s communications over the last several years. Notice the things he says, and how they have changed. Look: http://www.veteranstoday.com/2010/07/10/gordon-duff-classified-cia-transcript-counters-bin-laden-terror-role/ Thirdly, you can review the 'live' 9/11 footage here, which clearly shows the faked impact footage of the second plane. One 'live' shot shows the plane rapidly descending from well above the impact zone, where as another 'live' shot from a side angle shows the 2nd plane flying perfectly horizontal before it strikes the second tower: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gujn4jMGgIE Also, if you wish to review a statistical analysis of the 'eye-witnesses', which shows that 80% of eye-witnesses admit to not seeing and/or hearing an airliner, you can check out the analysis here in this free e-book by Andrew Johnson: http://www.lulu.com/product/file-download/9-11—finding-the-truth/5450222 ) I strongly believe these things because the evidence is overwhelmingly supportive of these claims, and I would be a poor scientist if I did not consider the enormous amount of evidence which shows those last few claims to most likely be true.
I also believe that our government did not organize 9/11, because very little evidence suggests that they did. Far more evidence suggests that another group of terrorists organized 9/11, then blamed it on Osama Bin Laden using their corporate media connections to fool our government and our country into going to war in the Middle East. Who these true terrorists were, I cannot say, because there is not enough evidence to conclusively prove anyone as guilty. However, others feel that there is enough proof to convict one of the suspected groups, but I only consider such theories as possible or somewhat likely at best, because not enough evidence has been presented to convict these 'suspects' in a court of law. Here is more info on one such possibility, and one of the individuals who feels strongly about that possibility:
Dr. Alan Sabrosky (Ph.D., University of Michigan) is a writer and consultant specializing in national and international security affairs. In December 1988, he received the Superior Civilian Service Award after more than five years of service at the U.S. Army War College as Director of Studies, Strategic Studies Institute, and holder of the General of the Army Douglas MacArthur Chair of Research. He is listed in WHO'S WHO IN THE EAST (23rd ed.). A Marine Corps Vietnam veteran and a 1986 graduate of the U.S. Army War College, Dr. Sabrosky's teaching and research appointments have included the United States Military Academy, the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), Middlebury College and Catholic University; while in government service, he held concurrent adjunct professorships at Georgetown University and the Johns Hopkins University School of Advanced International Studies (SAIS). Dr. Sabrosky has lectured widely on defense and foreign affairs in the United States and abroad. Dr. Sabrosky, along with many other military personel, have concluded that Israeli’s Mossad did 9/11, to send us to war against their enemies in the Middle East. Read more about his conclusions here: http://www.veteranstoday.com/2010/03/19/22329/ and about the topic of Israel's attack on the USS Liberty: http://www.veteranstoday.com/2010/06/08/israeli-war-crimes-from-the-uss-liberty-to-the-humanitarian-flotilla/ and the related topic of the 'dancing Israelis' who were caught filming and celebrating the 9/11 attacks as they happened, and the testimony of one of the police officers who arrested them, here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tRfhUezbKLw )
When it comes to 9/11, I regret to inform you that you are absolutely incorrect in your blind belief of the 'official' story.
I am not saying that I know 100% for sure who or what did it, but I do know that I have examined far more evidence than you, as much evidence as I possibly could over the last 2+ years, and that is why my beliefs are different than yours. Similarly, some Orthodox Christians who have examined very little scientific evidence still believe that evolution is false, when in fact, the evidence is overwhelmingly supportive of evolution. It might be useful to inform you that my beliefs were similar to yours before I started to view more and more evidence, including unpopular evidence, such as the thousands of photos, graphs, videos, and documents found at Dr. Judy Wood's website and at AE911Truth's website. To this very day, the only person that has put forth one cohesive, scientific conclusion, to explain ALL this related evidence, is Dr. Judy Wood. This is why her evidence-based court case against the corporations who hired NIST to do the 9/11 investigations (huge conflict-of-interest) made it all the way to the level of the U.S. Supreme Court in October of 2009, before being shot down by a judge due to his subjective nature of labeling the case as a “conspiracy theory”. It is illegal to repeatedly appeal a court case that is not evidence-backed, and cases which are not strongly based on evidence do not make it to the level of the U.S. Supreme Court. Her case was so strong that it made it all the way up to the top, before finally being unfairly shot down before being heard by that judge. Surprinsingly, Dr. Wood is the only truth-seeking researcher who has filed her evidence in a court of law. Not even Dr. Steven Jones has filed his 'peer-reviewed' nano-thermite paper with a court of law, most likely because he is part of the cover up, for thermite barely explains ANY of the evidence in comparison to the explanation put forth by Dr. Judy Wood.
It saddens me to know that you, someone who claims to be so 'scientific' and 'logical', has formed such a strong opinion about this topic while simultaneously refusing to view the hoards upon hoards of evidence which directly conflict with your beliefs. As long as you view all the available evidence and can put forth a better, more simple conclusion which successfully explains all this related evidence, then you can prove Dr. Wood, myself, and many others wrong, and you should have no problem doing so if we are all as 'crazy' as you claim us to be. Here is a short list of some of the major points of evidence which must be explained:
• How come most of the Twin Towers’ steel and concrete was transformed into a fine dust, while large quantities of aluminum exhibited strange electrical burns, yet paper was unharmed? Extreme heat from jet fuel (or explosives) does not selectively damage certain materials, so how come some materials turned to dust, while other materials were bent or burnt, and yet other materials were completely unharmed?
• Why was Hurricane Erin at its closest point to NYC on the morning of September 11th, yet it was not reported on by the major corporate media stations?
• How come there were statistically significant magnetosphere readings in Alaska at the very same time of the 9/11 attacks? Why were the 6 Alaskan magnetomer stations detecting normal readings until the 9/11 attacks commenced, when there was suddenly a huge surge in electromagnetic activity?
• How come there are many reports of power outages and electrical failures in the areas surrounding ground zero just as the attacks commenced?
• How were the Twin Towers turned to dust so fine, that the dust floated high up into our atmosphere. The satellite photos show a clear distinction between the black smoke and the whitish-grey dust, so what turned such a large portion of these buildings to dust so fine that it floated high into our atmosphere?
• How come 1,400+ vehicles located several blocks away (some up to ¼ a mile away) from ground zero experienced metal warping and electricity-like burns and holes during the attacks? If you think the building debris caused these things, then how come that same debris did not burn the clothing or skin of the nearby pedestrians it covered?
• How come countless vehicles located several blocks away from ground zero were flipped upside down or on their side, next to trees which still had all of their leaves on them?
• How come several steel beams were observed to be bent and/or shriveled up in very unusual ways, ways which have only been observed during The Hutchison Effect experiments?
• How come spontaneous rusting of materials occurred all around ground zero? In some instances, entire front-halves of cars were rusted, while the back-halves appeared to be virtually untouched?
• How come various debris at ground zero was still observed to be fuming and being hosed down well into 2008, as video evidence clearly shows? Do fires last for 7+ years? Do debris from fires need to be hosed down 7 years later?
• How come circular holes were observed in the windows of virtually all the buildings near ground zero, when holes like these are known only to be caused by longitudinal waves of energy? If building debris smashed the windows, they would have shattered in a predictable way, so how come these countless windows did not shatter, but instead, developed circular holes characteristic of the effect of longitudinal waves of energy on glass?
• How was the ‘bathtub’, the area directly beneath the Twin Towers, left virtually unharmed? How could thousands of tons of falling building debris not damage the ‘bathtub’ beneath the WTC buildings?
• How was the ‘Looney Toons’ gift shop in the basement of the WTC buildings left virtually unharmed, so dramatically that the ‘Bugs Bunny’ statue and other statues were not even scratched or dented? How could these figurines survive thousands of tons of falling building debris?
• How was the unharmed PATH Train beneath the WTC buildings left virtually unharmed? Shouldn’t falling building debris have crushed that train, or at the very least, knocked it off the tracks?
• How could thousands of tons of rapidly falling steel and concrete building debris leave the ‘Bath Tub’, the basement gift shops, and the PATH train, virtually unharmed? Shouldn’t thousands of tons of falling steel and concrete cause significant damage to at least one of these?
• How come Dr. Wood has already filed evidence-based legal cases against suspected 9/11-involved defense and weapons companies based on their conflict-of-interest relationship with N.I.S.T., yet other 9/11 “truth” researchers have not? How come Dr. Steven Jones has not officially filed his scientific ‘peer-reviewed’ nano-thermite evidence with Congress or the U.S. Courts?
• Why are groups like AE911Truth and PilotsFor911Truth just now claiming to be “pursuing a new 9/11 investigation” when Dr. Judy Wood has already filed many legal cases to pursue such an investigation, one which was successfully appealed to the level of the U.S. Supreme Court in October 2009?
• Why did Dr. Jones ban Dr. Wood from his ‘Scholars for 9/11 Truth’ group long ago, just because they had different conclusions about what destroyed the towers? Shouldn’t Dr. Jones and his ‘Scholars for 9/11 Truth’ group be supporting the 9/11 investigation that Dr. Judy Wood has already demanded with her legal cases, even if he does not agree with her conclusions?
• Why was I silently removed from the Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth (AE911Truth) petition simply for asking Richard Gage if he would examine the research of Dr. Judy Wood? Why didn’t AE911Truth just reply to my email question, but instead, silently removed me from their petition? I have donated over $100 to AE911Truth, so why was I silently removed from the petition simply for asking Richard Gage about Dr. Judy Wood? Why was I later contacted by AE911Truth when they discovered I was telling people about what they did to me? They could contact me to offer me a refund to stop telling people about how I was silently removed from their petition, but they couldn’t respond to my email which harmlessly asked Richard Gage if he had heard of Dr. Judy Wood?
• Why did United States Army Major Doug Rokke (retired) spontaneously contact me to try and convince me that explosives were the only things used on 9/11, and to convince me to stop talking about Dr. Judy Wood, yet he never provided any proof to back up his negative accusations against her?
• Why did Soviet Nuclear Intelligent Officer Dimitri Khalezov (retired) spontaneously contact me to try and convince me that underground nuclear explosives were what turned the buildings to fine particles of dust on 9/11, and to convince me to stop talking about Dr. Judy Wood, yet he never provided any significant proof to back up his negative accusations against her?
• Why did these high-ranking retired military officials randomly contact me, an insignificant medical student, when they should be contacting members of the U.S. Congress, and other high-ranking members of our government, with their concerns and the “evidence” they claim to have?In the mean time, I must go by what the evidence tells me, and the only scientist to successfully explain all the evidence is Dr. Judy Wood, that I am sure of. It doesn't mean she is right, because perhaps another scientist will come along who can better explain all the evidence with a more simple, cohesive, scientific conclusion, but in the mean time, the only person who has done so is Dr. Wood.
I am sorry that your beliefs regarding 9/11 are so strong despite your lack of ability to explain all the evidence. That is your problem, not mine.
Despite your continued mocking of me, I am proud to be a future physician who is open-minded enough to consider ALL the medical evidence as well, including the less-popular evidence. For example, if someone is diagnosed with cancer and is told she can live for 1 unpleasant month without treatment, or for 3 extremely agonizing months with chemotherapy and high-risk surgery, are those the only two options I should give her? Or should I look at less-popular evidence as well, such as the low-risk, highly successful Gerson Therapy which has cured many terminally ill cancer patients (not 100%, but still, a significant number of people, which is why Max Gerson was poisoned by arsenic not once, but twice, the second time which killed him). I am proud that I consider all evidence and all alternatives, including less-popular ones. You can learn more about the Gerson Therapy here: http://gerson.org/GersonTherapy/case_studies.htm
Perhaps you should start with UFOs. When did the government first start researching them? Who did they allow to first research these UFOs before the cover-up became more extensive and began involving NASA? His name was Wilbert Smith, and he researched UFOs for the government. You can view a documentary on him, with authentic audio clips of his voice, along with 2 other amazing documentaries, here: http://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=425339546816&id=14802233&ref=mf
Start small, then work your way up. There is lots to learn, and I am not going to hold your hand through this. If you want answers, go find them, for only you can determine what is true for your own self.
Please leave me alone now, for I will not be explaining myself to you again any time soon.
Thanks,
-Abe
PauldoMemberPlease leave me alone now, for I will not be explaining myself to you again any time soon.
I bet I could get you to explain yourself to me again soon. I only read the first and last lines of your last post. No way am I wasting my time reading all that inbetween gibberish you copied and pasted. Weirdo. Leave us alone!
aktifMemberABE STOP TALKING ABOUT 911
YOU HAVE BEEN TOLD MANY TIMES TO AND NO ONE HERE WANTS TO HEAR IT AND IT JUST CAUSES STRESS. STOP IT.
Mods note the previous post.
PookztAMemberMods note the previous post.
Mods, please also note the title of this Pauldo-created thread and the repeated instigating comments made by Pauldo. I defended myself, and it's over with.
PauldoMemberWhat are you even talking about Abe??? I haven't even once mentioned 9/11 in this entire thread. YOU are the one that keeps bringing it up in this thread. Come on now, the mods have asked you to stop posting about conspiracy shit!
PauldoMemberlook at this crazy manifesto you wrote to me…get a grip man!
Pauldo,
Shame on you for continually bringing up 9/11 despite the fact that this forum's moderators have politely asked us to not talk about it. Due to the fact that you keep pushing on me, I will make a few quick points for you to think about, but I will not participate in any major discussion about this topic due to the requests of the Chilluminati admnistrators. I am making this post because you have repeatedly brought up this topic and I am tired of being bashed by you in public, so I am going to now defend myself, and then leave you to think about my response without replying to any more of yours. Again, this is a defensive post, not an opportunity for you to try and discuss 9/11 with me. If you wish to discuss this, please just email me.
I am proud to remind you that my beliefs, although much different than yours, are strongly evidence-based, and those are the only strong beliefs I hold. Yes, I went through a short period of gullability after finally realizing that I had blindly believed in the corporate media's version of the events for so long, but thanks to you and many others, I was brought back down to 'reality', and shown that evidence is the only thing which should formulate strong beliefs, especially considering the fact that I will someday be in charge of saving peoples' lives. Any other weaker beliefs I have are more “ponderings” or “beliefs in possibility” or “theories”. For example, I strongly believe that Osama Bin Laden did not commit 9/11, and I also strongly believe that large airliners did not crash into the towers on 9/11. (here are a few things you should consider. First of all, Osama Bin Laden is not listed as ‘wanted for 9/11’ on the FBIs official website. Why is this? He is clearly listed as wanted for a previous crime of 1998, so why is he not also listed as wanted for 9/11? Look: http://www.fbi.gov/wanted/topten/fugitives/laden.htm Secondly, at the following link, you will get to see an official CIA transcript of Osama Bin Laden’s communications over the last several years. Notice the things he says, and how they have changed. Look: http://www.veteranstoday.com/2010/07/10/gordon-duff-classified-cia-transcript-counters-bin-laden-terror-role/ Thirdly, you can review the 'live' 9/11 footage here, which clearly shows the faked impact footage of the second plane. One 'live' shot shows the plane rapidly descending from well above the impact zone, where as another 'live' shot from a side angle shows the 2nd plane flying perfectly horizontal before it strikes the second tower: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gujn4jMGgIE Also, if you wish to review a statistical analysis of the 'eye-witnesses', which shows that 80% of eye-witnesses admit to not seeing and/or hearing an airliner, you can check out the analysis here in this free e-book by Andrew Johnson: http://www.lulu.com/product/file-download/9-11—finding-the-truth/5450222 ) I strongly believe these things because the evidence is overwhelmingly supportive of these claims, and I would be a poor scientist if I did not consider the enormous amount of evidence which shows those last few claims to most likely be true.
I also believe that our government did not organize 9/11, because very little evidence suggests that they did. Far more evidence suggests that another group of terrorists organized 9/11, then blamed it on Osama Bin Laden using their corporate media connections to fool our government and our country into going to war in the Middle East. Who these true terrorists were, I cannot say, because there is not enough evidence to conclusively prove anyone as guilty. However, others feel that there is enough proof to convict one of the suspected groups, but I only consider such theories as possible or somewhat likely at best, because not enough evidence has been presented to convict these 'suspects' in a court of law. Here is more info on one such possibility, and one of the individuals who feels strongly about that possibility:
Dr. Alan Sabrosky (Ph.D., University of Michigan) is a writer and consultant specializing in national and international security affairs. In December 1988, he received the Superior Civilian Service Award after more than five years of service at the U.S. Army War College as Director of Studies, Strategic Studies Institute, and holder of the General of the Army Douglas MacArthur Chair of Research. He is listed in WHO'S WHO IN THE EAST (23rd ed.). A Marine Corps Vietnam veteran and a 1986 graduate of the U.S. Army War College, Dr. Sabrosky's teaching and research appointments have included the United States Military Academy, the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), Middlebury College and Catholic University; while in government service, he held concurrent adjunct professorships at Georgetown University and the Johns Hopkins University School of Advanced International Studies (SAIS). Dr. Sabrosky has lectured widely on defense and foreign affairs in the United States and abroad. Dr. Sabrosky, along with many other military personel, have concluded that Israeli’s Mossad did 9/11, to send us to war against their enemies in the Middle East. Read more about his conclusions here: http://www.veteranstoday.com/2010/03/19/22329/ and about the topic of Israel's attack on the USS Liberty: http://www.veteranstoday.com/2010/06/08/israeli-war-crimes-from-the-uss-liberty-to-the-humanitarian-flotilla/ and the related topic of the 'dancing Israelis' who were caught filming and celebrating the 9/11 attacks as they happened, and the testimony of one of the police officers who arrested them, here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tRfhUezbKLw )
When it comes to 9/11, I regret to inform you that you are absolutely incorrect in your blind belief of the 'official' story.
I am not saying that I know 100% for sure who or what did it, but I do know that I have examined far more evidence than you, as much evidence as I possibly could over the last 2+ years, and that is why my beliefs are different than yours. Similarly, some Orthodox Christians who have examined very little scientific evidence still believe that evolution is false, when in fact, the evidence is overwhelmingly supportive of evolution. It might be useful to inform you that my beliefs were similar to yours before I started to view more and more evidence, including unpopular evidence, such as the thousands of photos, graphs, videos, and documents found at Dr. Judy Wood's website and at AE911Truth's website. To this very day, the only person that has put forth one cohesive, scientific conclusion, to explain ALL this related evidence, is Dr. Judy Wood. This is why her evidence-based court case against the corporations who hired NIST to do the 9/11 investigations (huge conflict-of-interest) made it all the way to the level of the U.S. Supreme Court in October of 2009, before being shot down by a judge due to his subjective nature of labeling the case as a “conspiracy theory”. It is illegal to repeatedly appeal a court case that is not evidence-backed, and cases which are not strongly based on evidence do not make it to the level of the U.S. Supreme Court. Her case was so strong that it made it all the way up to the top, before finally being unfairly shot down before being heard by that judge. Surprinsingly, Dr. Wood is the only truth-seeking researcher who has filed her evidence in a court of law. Not even Dr. Steven Jones has filed his 'peer-reviewed' nano-thermite paper with a court of law, most likely because he is part of the cover up, for thermite barely explains ANY of the evidence in comparison to the explanation put forth by Dr. Judy Wood.
It saddens me to know that you, someone who claims to be so 'scientific' and 'logical', has formed such a strong opinion about this topic while simultaneously refusing to view the hoards upon hoards of evidence which directly conflict with your beliefs. As long as you view all the available evidence and can put forth a better, more simple conclusion which successfully explains all this related evidence, then you can prove Dr. Wood, myself, and many others wrong, and you should have no problem doing so if we are all as 'crazy' as you claim us to be. Here is a short list of some of the major points of evidence which must be explained:
• How come most of the Twin Towers’ steel and concrete was transformed into a fine dust, while large quantities of aluminum exhibited strange electrical burns, yet paper was unharmed? Extreme heat from jet fuel (or explosives) does not selectively damage certain materials, so how come some materials turned to dust, while other materials were bent or burnt, and yet other materials were completely unharmed?
• Why was Hurricane Erin at its closest point to NYC on the morning of September 11th, yet it was not reported on by the major corporate media stations?
• How come there were statistically significant magnetosphere readings in Alaska at the very same time of the 9/11 attacks? Why were the 6 Alaskan magnetomer stations detecting normal readings until the 9/11 attacks commenced, when there was suddenly a huge surge in electromagnetic activity?
• How come there are many reports of power outages and electrical failures in the areas surrounding ground zero just as the attacks commenced?
• How were the Twin Towers turned to dust so fine, that the dust floated high up into our atmosphere. The satellite photos show a clear distinction between the black smoke and the whitish-grey dust, so what turned such a large portion of these buildings to dust so fine that it floated high into our atmosphere?
• How come 1,400+ vehicles located several blocks away (some up to ¼ a mile away) from ground zero experienced metal warping and electricity-like burns and holes during the attacks? If you think the building debris caused these things, then how come that same debris did not burn the clothing or skin of the nearby pedestrians it covered?
• How come countless vehicles located several blocks away from ground zero were flipped upside down or on their side, next to trees which still had all of their leaves on them?
• How come several steel beams were observed to be bent and/or shriveled up in very unusual ways, ways which have only been observed during The Hutchison Effect experiments?
• How come spontaneous rusting of materials occurred all around ground zero? In some instances, entire front-halves of cars were rusted, while the back-halves appeared to be virtually untouched?
• How come various debris at ground zero was still observed to be fuming and being hosed down well into 2008, as video evidence clearly shows? Do fires last for 7+ years? Do debris from fires need to be hosed down 7 years later?
• How come circular holes were observed in the windows of virtually all the buildings near ground zero, when holes like these are known only to be caused by longitudinal waves of energy? If building debris smashed the windows, they would have shattered in a predictable way, so how come these countless windows did not shatter, but instead, developed circular holes characteristic of the effect of longitudinal waves of energy on glass?
• How was the ‘bathtub’, the area directly beneath the Twin Towers, left virtually unharmed? How could thousands of tons of falling building debris not damage the ‘bathtub’ beneath the WTC buildings?
• How was the ‘Looney Toons’ gift shop in the basement of the WTC buildings left virtually unharmed, so dramatically that the ‘Bugs Bunny’ statue and other statues were not even scratched or dented? How could these figurines survive thousands of tons of falling building debris?
• How was the unharmed PATH Train beneath the WTC buildings left virtually unharmed? Shouldn’t falling building debris have crushed that train, or at the very least, knocked it off the tracks?
• How could thousands of tons of rapidly falling steel and concrete building debris leave the ‘Bath Tub’, the basement gift shops, and the PATH train, virtually unharmed? Shouldn’t thousands of tons of falling steel and concrete cause significant damage to at least one of these?
• How come Dr. Wood has already filed evidence-based legal cases against suspected 9/11-involved defense and weapons companies based on their conflict-of-interest relationship with N.I.S.T., yet other 9/11 “truth” researchers have not? How come Dr. Steven Jones has not officially filed his scientific ‘peer-reviewed’ nano-thermite evidence with Congress or the U.S. Courts?
• Why are groups like AE911Truth and PilotsFor911Truth just now claiming to be “pursuing a new 9/11 investigation” when Dr. Judy Wood has already filed many legal cases to pursue such an investigation, one which was successfully appealed to the level of the U.S. Supreme Court in October 2009?
• Why did Dr. Jones ban Dr. Wood from his ‘Scholars for 9/11 Truth’ group long ago, just because they had different conclusions about what destroyed the towers? Shouldn’t Dr. Jones and his ‘Scholars for 9/11 Truth’ group be supporting the 9/11 investigation that Dr. Judy Wood has already demanded with her legal cases, even if he does not agree with her conclusions?
• Why was I silently removed from the Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth (AE911Truth) petition simply for asking Richard Gage if he would examine the research of Dr. Judy Wood? Why didn’t AE911Truth just reply to my email question, but instead, silently removed me from their petition? I have donated over $100 to AE911Truth, so why was I silently removed from the petition simply for asking Richard Gage about Dr. Judy Wood? Why was I later contacted by AE911Truth when they discovered I was telling people about what they did to me? They could contact me to offer me a refund to stop telling people about how I was silently removed from their petition, but they couldn’t respond to my email which harmlessly asked Richard Gage if he had heard of Dr. Judy Wood?
• Why did United States Army Major Doug Rokke (retired) spontaneously contact me to try and convince me that explosives were the only things used on 9/11, and to convince me to stop talking about Dr. Judy Wood, yet he never provided any proof to back up his negative accusations against her?
• Why did Soviet Nuclear Intelligent Officer Dimitri Khalezov (retired) spontaneously contact me to try and convince me that underground nuclear explosives were what turned the buildings to fine particles of dust on 9/11, and to convince me to stop talking about Dr. Judy Wood, yet he never provided any significant proof to back up his negative accusations against her?
• Why did these high-ranking retired military officials randomly contact me, an insignificant medical student, when they should be contacting members of the U.S. Congress, and other high-ranking members of our government, with their concerns and the “evidence” they claim to have?In the mean time, I must go by what the evidence tells me, and the only scientist to successfully explain all the evidence is Dr. Judy Wood, that I am sure of. It doesn't mean she is right, because perhaps another scientist will come along who can better explain all the evidence with a more simple, cohesive, scientific conclusion, but in the mean time, the only person who has done so is Dr. Wood.
I am sorry that your beliefs regarding 9/11 are so strong despite your lack of ability to explain all the evidence. That is your problem, not mine.
Despite your continued mocking of me, I am proud to be a future physician who is open-minded enough to consider ALL the medical evidence as well, including the less-popular evidence. For example, if someone is diagnosed with cancer and is told she can live for 1 unpleasant month without treatment, or for 3 extremely agonizing months with chemotherapy and high-risk surgery, are those the only two options I should give her? Or should I look at less-popular evidence as well, such as the low-risk, highly successful Gerson Therapy which has cured many terminally ill cancer patients (not 100%, but still, a significant number of people, which is why Max Gerson was poisoned by arsenic not once, but twice, the second time which killed him). I am proud that I consider all evidence and all alternatives, including less-popular ones. You can learn more about the Gerson Therapy here: http://gerson.org/GersonTherapy/case_studies.htm
Perhaps you should start with UFOs. When did the government first start researching them? Who did they allow to first research these UFOs before the cover-up became more extensive and began involving NASA? His name was Wilbert Smith, and he researched UFOs for the government. You can view a documentary on him, with authentic audio clips of his voice, along with 2 other amazing documentaries, here: http://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=425339546816&id=14802233&ref=mf
Start small, then work your way up. There is lots to learn, and I am not going to hold your hand through this. If you want answers, go find them, for only you can determine what is true for your own self.
Please leave me alone now, for I will not be explaining myself to you again any time soon.
Thanks,
-Abe
PookztAMemberhttp://myprops.org/channelcontent/Brain-surgery-boot-camp/
« Last Edit: Today at 07:41:21 AM by Pauldo »
(Original Title of Thread: “Brain-surgery-boot-camp & 9/11“)
aww Abe…you forgot to ask what this video about neurosurgery training has to do with?
NOTHING! There is no relation between the two topics and they should NEVER be mixed. Got it?
And it's lame sauce man to try to give your pet personal beliefs any validity via your chosen profession.
« Last Edit: Today at 07:42:21 AM by Pauldo »
(Original Post: “aww Abe…you forgot to ask what this video about neurosurgery training has to do with 9/11?”)
Pauldo,
I noticed you recently removed the term “9/11” from all your posts this morning in an attempt to make my last night's post look unprovoked, even though you clearly were using this thread to bring up 9/11 and to mock me for my beliefs. If you have a problem with me or my beliefs, can you please just email me next time instead of creating a thread in a public forum for the primary purpose of trying to aggravate me?
Despite the instigating title of this thread (before your edited it this morning) and your repeated instigating comments (before you edited them this morning), I was doing a good job of ignoring your attempts to upset me and to bring up 9/11 by not replying to anything but the brain-surgery part of the thread, until just last night when I finally realized ignoring you wasn't working and that I needed to defend myself from your repeated mockery.
Please note the “EDIT” timestamp in the posts I just quoted, and you will see that Pauldo just recently removed the term “9/11” from his posts and from the title of the thread.
Nice try Pauldo, why the need for dishonesty? Why must you lie to the people of this forum?
What are you even talking about Abe??? I haven't even once mentioned 9/11 in this entire thread. YOU are the one that keeps bringing it up in this thread. Come on now, the mods have asked you to stop posting about conspiracy shit!
esmokahParticipantyou boys are just being silly this morning. give it a rest.
MachiGuest@Pauldo, man looks like you haven't masturbate this morning yet *hint*, usually this helps a little….
@Abe, we get this man, nobody believes in the official story but….those two years of gaining knowledge about the subject took you where? what have you actually accomplished to help all those people who lost their loved ones, what have you managed to do that helps the rest of us citizens who are manipulated by us government, what do you suggest we all should do?
PauldoMemberI feel SOOOO insulted! I would NEVER go back and factually edit my original post after someone has already replied in order to make myself look better. Where would I have learned to do something like that? And from who? I wonder…
I knew I could get you to explain yourself to me again soon. ;D
-
AuthorPosts
