- This topic is empty.
-
AuthorPosts
-
AscensionKeymasterI agree with everything you said Joseph. Abe, rather than reading these, posting them then trying to defend them, you should go back and look at some proper scientific methods.
It should be a big red flag to be skeptical when someone presents a “scientific” claim without presenting any scientific facts to support it immediately. Hearsay, government action and neighbor's claims do not count as evidence. Show me a repeatable experiment that was laid out using proper methods and documented correctly (how many times have we learned this stuff?), anything else isn't worth wasting your time on.
edaisGuestI mean, don't you see the profit motive? People, intelligent people even, will buy into this stuff, go to workshops, make donations, disseminate the “truth” through the internet without engaging in the merest critical examination of the weight of the evidence.
That's the real conspiracy right there.
BanjankriMemberIt makes me sad to see this same discussion happening on this forum over and over. We're supposed to be intellectual types. :'(
soospicyGuestdont be sad, have a taco!!!
BanjankriMember…so that electronic music enthusiasts and hippies can gawk..
I represent, er resent this remark hahha
BanjankriMember*off topic (thank god)*
Anyone been brave enough to try the shrimp tacos from taco bell?

soospicyGuesti couldnt muster up enough courage
Nameless OneParticipantTaco bell shrimp tacos causes autism!
edaisGuest…and scabies, and dementia, blurred vision, night terrors, night sweats, constipation, indigestion, vomiting, rabies, Parkinson's disease…
How sad are you now, Blake? Another similar conversation resurrected!!!
PookztAMemberI consider the points I have made and the information provided, in the videos and in my posts, as strong evidence suggesting some legitimacy to The Hutchison Effect.
The e-book I sent you is a summary of why I support Dr. Wood and Mr. Hutchison, it is not the only piece of evidence which I consider.
Not all evidence is going to be peer-reviewed and in a scientific journal. When it comes to neuroscience, which is a very non-controversial field, I prefer evidence presented in scientific journals since it is readily available, but when it comes to suppressed technologies and controversial issues such as Cold Fusion, you have to understand that this stuff is not going to be talked about by the mainstream media, regardless of how true or how false it is.
This might be why MIT scientist Eugene Mallove resigned in protest after their study supported Cold Fusion, but during the publication process, their data was falsely manipulated so that it no longer supported Cold Fusion, which caused him to resign in protest. After he resigned due to the false manipulation of their Cold Fusion verification study, he then was murdered.
I don't want to go into the cover-up stuff, I just wanted to share this information. If you don't think it's credible, that is fine, you are entitled to your opinion, and I hope you at least found it entertaining, but please do not accuse me of being unscientific just because I consider all forms of evidence, even evidence that is not found in peer-reviewed journals. Like I said, I never claimed to know 100% about what is going on and what is true or false, but there is quite a bit of evidence suggesting that the cover up of Cold Fusion and of John Hutchison's work are related.
In my honest opinion, Cold Fusion and The Hutchison Effect are very real. Just my opinion.
I hope you enjoy the 68 minute documentary about The Hutchison Effect technology, because it is very, very interesting.
Have a good day people,
-Abe
_eNdo_GuestCan you explain what evidence exists that suggests legitimacy? Is it the videos? I have not been able to find any evidence yet…
AscensionKeymasterplease do not accuse me of being unscientific just because I consider all forms of evidence, even evidence that is not found in peer-reviewed journals. Like I said,
This is basically the definition of being unscientific. You say considering like you're not believing them and trying to pass them as fact, but this is exactly what you have done and are continuing to do.
PookztAMemberKevin and Eric,
That is not the “definition” of being unscientific. Scientists consider all evidence, not just 'data' published in scientifc journals. Sure that kind of data is the most powerful evidence, but it is not the only kind of evidence.
I am very open-minded and I consider all forms of evidence, including testimonies, such as the testimony from Eugeme Mallov from MIT University and his testimony about how his results verified Cold Fusion's reality, but his results were then suspiciously changed during the publication process, which is why he resigned in protest, and then he was murdered.
You may not consider his study, his resignation, and his murder, evidence of Cold Fusion, but I do (especially his claim that his study supported Cold Fusion but the results were falsely manipulated so that they no longer appeared to support Cold Fusion, during the publication process).
I am very open-minded, and I admit I am probably not right about everything, but this open-mindedness does not make me unscientific. I consider all forms of evidence, I review that evidence to the best of my knowledge, and I make educated decisions based on the evidence I observe.
I respect you and your opinion, but unfortunately I disagree with you.
Also, I didn't think this would create such a large discussion, so I will try to respond to you all less so that I don't fuel too much discussion or distraction about this topic, because Sacred Earth is coming up and I am not trying to take away from it, but I definitely wanted to share this information with you because I found it to be very cool.
-Abe
AscensionKeymasterI think we can all agree on a central idea that “shit just happens”. Interpret as you wish…
_eNdo_GuestIf NASA doesn't buy it neither do I 🙂
-
AuthorPosts