- This topic is empty.
-
AuthorPosts
-
justinGuestAnd this. You gotta watch til the end. Watch carefully.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HipM-Wd9gZE&feature=related
😮 😮 😮 😮 😮 😮 😮 😮LOL that scared the shit out of my cat 😀
PookztAMemberlols
thanks for posting the videos Justin!
PookztAMemberLetter from the U.S. Army reminding Mr. Hutchison that the information regarding The Hutchison Effect is 'Classified': http://www.thehutchisoneffect.com/docs/Hutch%20Letters2.pdf
Letter from Electric Spacecraft Journal of Research containing information that was submitted to NASA for use in improving anti-gravity spacecraft propulsion technologies: http://www.thehutchisoneffect.com/docs/Hutchison%20Effect%20-%20More%20Info.pdf
Document from The Planetary Association for Clean Energy, discussing possible theories behind how The Hutchison Effect is generated, and all sorts of other relevant information, including a time line of relevant events concerning John Hutchison and The Hutchison Effect: http://www.thehutchisoneffect.com/docs/The%20Hutchison%20Effect%20File.pdf
More to come…. will just add them to this post unless someone posts before then.
here is a picture of a document from Nuclear Physicist, Dr. Robert Koontz Ph.D, testifying to the validity of The Hutchison Effect:

heres a pic of the Center for the Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence (CSETI) when they came to investigate Mr. Hutchison:

here is a document from the Canadian Department of National Defense, discussing some of their equipment that Mr. Hutchison has used to generate the effects:

Here is a document discussing that some of Mr. Hutchison's research has been submitted to NASA

Here is a letter to NASA briefly discussing The Hutchison Effect and its potential application for space exploration, and it also mentions that Mr. Hutchison's experiments have been successfully replicated by Toronto researcher George Hathaway:

I'm not saying that you all should be 100% convinced by this, but I think there has been more than enough information presented to at least show you that this is probably not a hoax.
For those of you that claim this is a hoax, I would like to see your evidence.
Also, if anyone wants to go see The Hutchison Effect first hand, Mr. Hutchison welcomes visitors from all over and is willing to demonstrate The Hutchison Effect to them since he has gotten very good at replicating various effects.
I really think we are going to hear a lot more about John Hutchison over the next 10 years.
-Abe
zensphereMemberFor those of you that claim this is a hoax, I would like to see your evidence.
Do you still not understand burden of proof? ???
You should really read this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philosophic_burden_of_proof#Holder_of_the_burden
To clarify (If you assume I think it's a hoax), I don't know either way, but remain unconvinced…
Nameless OneParticipantLetter from the U.S. Army reminding Mr. Hutchison that the information regarding The Hutchison Effect is 'Classified': http://www.thehutchisoneffect.com/docs/Hutch%20Letters2.pdf
Do you even read these documents you cite as proof?
Here we have:
1) a letter stating that a report is classified (so what?)
2) a freedom of information act request was denied (what was being asked?)
3) a denial of a FOIA request for bureaucratic reasons
4) more bureaucratic run-arounds
5) a sceptical note asking for legible hand-writing and a repeatable experimental procedure… pretty much what I would write if I were being polite
6) first page of some random letter not having anything to do with the othersAll this is proof of is that the US Army was initially intrigued, made a report that was later classified, and has been ignoring Hutchinson ever since.
Are any of the other links better proof of anything or are they all a similar waste of time?
I'm not saying that you all should be 100% convinced by this, but I think there has been more than enough information presented to at least show you that this is probably not a hoax.
For those of you that claim this is a hoax, I would like to see your evidence.
It never ceases to amaze me just how dense you can be. Burden of proof, remember? You're the one making the wild claims. You must provide solid evidence.
PookztAMemberyes I did read all these documents, but with the long ones, I only read the first few pages.
Also, im not trying to proove anything really, i am just trying to show you guys why i think this is most likely not a hoax. that is why i said “i know this wont be 100% convincing” or whatever. If you still think that this is a hoax after seeing all this information, that's up to you, and whatever you decide is cool with me.
again, i understand the burden of proof is on Mr. Hutchison, that is why he openly demonstrates his effect to researchers that come visit his lab. now we just gotta get some well-funded science labs other than military ones to go check him out.
in time, proof will come for u guys. like i said, in 3 years, if this technology is not yet mainstream, i am going to help him develop it or at least help him find laboratories that will.
Mr. Hutchison is against patents, says he wants the technology to be free for all and used for good.
i will get back to u folks in like 3-5 years on this, but in the mean time, please just go easy, and don't just call it a hoax. i can understand if you aren't convinced, that's fine, but please just dont call this a hoax after seeing all this info.
saying it “could” be a hoax is one thing, but saying it “is” a hoax is another. this would have to be a pretty big hoax if so, with lots of people contributing to the hoax. in fact, if this is a hoax, then it is a conspiracy, because a group of people would be conspiring to play a big trick on everyone.
I believe this is not a hoax, but that is just me.
thanks for understanding
-Abe
P.S. Basilisk, read this one more closely:

PauldoMemberIt's a hoax and a conspiracy of the stupid.
PookztAMemberIt's a hoax and a conspiracy of the stupid.
how do u know for sure? perhaps you could share the evidence you are basing your decision off of? I would like to see it, because I like looking at evidence of all kinds.
Thanks if u can share it,
-Abe
justinGuestI don't really need any convincing because I trust the evidence of my own senses, but for those who first need to see a mainstream news article in order to feel comfortable: http://www.cnn.com/2003/TECH/09/05/wow.tech.black.world
Nameless OneParticipant
Yeah, I Googled Koontz since it seemed like the most reputable endorsement… but you can see he's been drinking the kool-aid as well.
zensphereMemberI don't really need any convincing because I trust the evidence of my own senses, but for those who first need to see a mainstream news article in order to feel comfortable: http://www.cnn.com/2003/TECH/09/05/wow.tech.black.world
Nice article. My grandfather was a black world engineer. Who knows what he was working on?
PookztAMemberI don't really need any convincing because I trust the evidence of my own senses, but for those who first need to see a mainstream news article in order to feel comfortable: http://www.cnn.com/2003/TECH/09/05/wow.tech.black.world
nice article indeed justin, thanks for sharing this
conspiratheoristGuestAmazing how pookzta goes back and edits his posts time and time again..when this thread started pook was positively sure of the hutchison…now he is just presenting facts and doesnt care what others think…long live pook…wish he puts his energy into something more constructive 🙁
If he hasnt realised how much time he has wasted since the last 2 years, he's in for a rude shock when he finaly wakes up…
Also wonder who the “friend” is who showed him this path !!!
edaisGuestA least he isn't just relentlessly posting youtube videos right now, I guess.
PauldoMemberIt's a hoax and a conspiracy of the stupid.
how do u know for sure? perhaps you could share the evidence you are basing your decision off of? I would like to see it, because I like looking at evidence of all kinds.
Thanks if u can share it,
-Abe
How do I know it's a hoax and conspiracy of the stupid? Because you believe in it! ;D
How many times do people have to tell you…? It's on the person making the claim (you) that is responsible for providing the proof. Logic does not work any other way no matter how much you would want to.
-
AuthorPosts