An Inconvenient Truth

  • This topic is empty.
Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 15 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #186056 Reply
    Mr. Roboto
    Guest

    I'm not one to stir up polictical or religious debates but damn it! 

    Tonight my wife insisted on movies after the rediculous game and came home with one I had mentioned that I wanted to see.  The documentary “An inconvenient truth” with Al Gore hosting and narrating.  If you have children this is a must see. If you plan on having children, if you have nieces or nephews, if you know someones nieces or nephews,  if you have a dog, cat, or alligator for a pet, if your a human, THIS MOVIE IS A MUST SEE!

    The reason I'm posting these thoughts here is it seems this community is a community that cares.(Although I plan on posting this elsewhere.) A untitled community that has the abilty to come together from some many different walks of life, and spend time together in near perfect balance. 

    One of our best friends in existence, (the earth) is dying at a rate never seen before in history and WE are killing it.  I….am killing it.  Unknowingly till now.  Now that I know and believe I've found my biggest contribution to co2 emmisions is my car.  I drive a 1989 van that pukes exhaust to the point that I contribute more than the average American.  There is a website, climatecrisis.net  that you enter a few numbers and find out how much your killing the earth. 

    The documentary has so much credible informantion from scientist throughout the world that only your own ignorance will prevent you from believing it.  If you plan on replying to this post with that kind of ignorance, save your words.  You are becoming the minority in this battle to save our world.

    I also believe as a psy community that we need to start preaching this truth.  No I don't mean some guy at a pulpit in between dj sets.  We always have “no trance events” but do we all continue that when we get home.  I'm guilty.  Only you know your truth.  You have to ask yourself what your doing wrong?  What can you do right?

    We all have to answer these questions to the next generation.  You know, the one that will take care of us when we can't take care of ourselves anymore.  The generation that has to live with consequenes from our actions.  The generation that will have to scramble to find a way to survive in a unpredictable planet.  The one that my children are growing up in right this very moment.

    Yes, there has been a motive for me to type all of this……. my kids.  I can't bare the thought of things becoming that much more complicated in the world than they are now.  There are so many things that are beyond our control.  But there is something we can do thats greater that anything man kind has ever done before, we can save our world!  Each and everyone of us has that power.  Are you going to use it, is the question.  My kids are wanting to know!

    “The word psychedelic is a neologism coined from the Greek words for “mind,”  (psyche), and “manifest,” (delos).
    A psychedelic experience is characterized by the perception of aspects of one's mind previously unknown, or by the creative exuberance of the mind liberated from its ordinary fetters.”   (compliments of wiki)

    We of all people should be open to this harsh truth.  If you can relate to the above defintion, you know what I mean!  I know many of us are aware, but are we doing anything about it?

    I post in confidence….belief….and hope that anyone coming to this site and reading this post will be receptive.  And will be excepting of the fact that if you understand these truths that the time has come to spread the word in a way that has never been done before!  Realize that the flower child posters of the 60's didn't work. Realize our government doesn't care.  Realize that the goverment and media have, once again, tried to pull the wool over our eyes.  Realize the man in the documentary was almost our president and has now made it his lifes mission to spread this message.  Realize that we hold the power.  Realize that all the nieces, nephews, dogs, cats, birds, plants, trees, even every grain of sand wants to know, what WE are gonna do about it.  They have a right to know, cause it's not there fault……. it's ours. 

      Let's make 2007 a year of change as a community together and apart.  In our everyday lives, and on the weekends that we stomp in unison, the earth has graced us with amazing places to join together and be who we are.  It's time we take care of her.  The time is now!!!!!!!!  The decision is ours!!!!!!!!  The world awaits our answer!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    No apologizes from me for being abrasive on this post.  If you don't like what I've had to say, go to Mars!

    #204034 Reply
    Robyo
    Participant

    I haven't seen the movie yet, but that's awesome that you're excited to be an activist, Roboto.  ;D
    Do what you can to help heal the planet.

    On my own soapbox: I'm still not convinced Global-warming isn't a hoax, or at least hyped up by the globalists to tax the west while continuing to pollute (in the 3rd world and space) and generally centralize more world control.  Al Gore is one of them. His family has huge investments in the oil biz…

    #204035 Reply
    Mr. Roboto
    Guest

    Sorry for being a little over the top, margarita's at diner talking a little more than I realized!  I still stand behind what I said. ::)

    #204036 Reply
    HARDKORNATE
    Member

    Al Gore Is a Greenhouse Gasbag
    Penn professor Bob Giegengack has a few quibbles with the former VP on this whole global warming thing

    By John Marchese

    LUKEWARM: Says Gieg of Gore, “What he's doing is no less than the scare tactics used by people like Karl Rove.” / Photo by Chris Crisman
    It’s the last day of November, which means winter begins in three weeks. Yet the temperature on the Penn campus is nearing 70 degrees, and it’s muggy. Walking to the offices of the Department of Earth and Environmental Science from a remote parking lot makes me sweaty. Global Warming.

    Driving here this morning, I heard a report on WHYY from National Public Radio that the International Ski Federation was canceling races because there’s no snow in the Alps. Got to be Global Warming!

    Yesterday, down the road in Washington, where the temperature was 16 degrees above normal, the Supreme Court heard arguments in a case in which 13 state governments are suing the Environmental Protection Agency to force the government to begin controlling carbon dioxide as a pollutant under the decades-old Clean Air Act. If that doesn’t happen, the states claim, the rising sea levels caused by greenhouse gases will rob them of coastline. GLOBAL WARMING!!

    And this is just one ordinary day in the new normal. Even if daily weather has nothing to do with global warming, and even if the scientific debate about it is not quite done, its cultural moment has certainly begun. Insurance companies have stopped writing policies for coastline residents. A government report out of England warns that global warming may be so economically deleterious that it will make the upheaval of the Great Depression and World War II seem benign.

    Michael Crichton has already dramatized the issue in a best-selling novel. Leonardo DiCaprio is working on a documentary on the subject. A recent Time magazine cover featured a polar bear in danger of drowning and the warning: “Be Worried. Be Very Worried.”

    I’ve come to Penn to see the skeptic.

    In Room 100 of the classic Christopher Wren-inspired Towne Building, Robert Giegengack seems much less than worried. The 67-year-old professor is preparing to give one of the semester’s final lectures to his 150-student class in environmental analysis, a popular science elective among Penn’s arts and sciences undergrads.

    For decades, Giegengack was content to be a relatively obscure geologist who taught more than he published. Recently, though, he’s stepped into the swirling tempest surrounding global warming, in part because he says it’s not even one of the top 10 environmental problems we face. To make that point, he occasionally joins in a panel discussion, or gives a quote to a science writer. He’s thinking about writing something for one of the smarty-pants magazines. “I’ve always been interested in this question,” he says, “but when I first started working, no one cared – you couldn’t get an article published if you wanted to.” Now, though, “The public appetite for all this crap seems to be insatiable.”

    Giegengack is a slim man of medium height, with a prominent nose and a very high forehead. “I traded my hair for eyeglasses,” he’s been known to say. In this weird late-fall weather, he’s dressed as if he might run off for a round of golf or a sail – khaki pants, striped dress shirt (short-sleeved) and boat shoes. His name is pronounced “GEEG-in-gack,” and over the nearly four decades he has taught at Penn, students have developed the habit of simply calling him “Gieg.”

    Gieg is situated at a lectern in the pit of an amphitheater classroom. As the seats fill, he fiddles with his Mac laptop, where he has stored a PowerPoint presentation that covers today’s lecture. Before that, though, he runs a short clip from a Simpsons episode in which Bart and Lisa argue over whether water drains in different directions in the Southern and Northern hemispheres. Though Gieg has long been known as an entertaining lecturer, he’s not The Simpsons. The students laugh out loud at the clip, as does their professor. When the lights come back on, the professor assures them: “Bart will probably not be on the final.”

    The class is a typical-seeming group, heavy on girls, some of whom wear ripped jeans and do-rags, others of whom are carefully made up and snappily dressed, pulling their notebooks from designer bags. Midway through the class, Gieg says, “Now it’s time for us to talk about the number one political/environmental issue of our time.” He reads a snippet from a New York Times editorial about the Supreme Court global-warming case.

    “What I’m going to try to do the rest of today and also probably on Tuesday is bring you up to date on this. I’ll try to avoid editorializing or politicking. I’ll just tell you some stuff. Give you information. There’s lot’s of stuff, and it’s very complicated.”

    Gieg gazes upward toward his young charges. “Every single one of you knows more about this than Al Gore,” he tells the undergrads. “And vastly more than anyone in this present administration.”

    YOU REMEMBER AL GORE. Congressman, then senator from a political dynasty in Tennessee. Vice president for the eight years of the Clinton administration. President-elect of the United States for about 10 minutes, before being waylaid by the dangling chad. Since his bitter, disputed loss to George W. Bush, Gore has gone through some changes. He tried sporting a beard, reinvented himself as a media entrepreneur, hosted Saturday Night Live, gained a lot of weight. Then, last May, he burst back into the public eye as the star of a surprisingly successful documentary on global warming called An Inconvenient Truth. In a way that sometimes happens in America, Al Gore has come to personify an issue that until recently, most of us didn’t know we needed to know or care about. Oprah calls him “our Noah.” But if she’s going to get all ancient on us, Cassandra might be the better comparison.

    Gore’s film has become the third highest grossing documentary ever, way behind Michael Moore’s Fahrenheit 9/11 but closing in on number two, the equally surprising March of the Penguins. An Inconvenient Truth is basically the video of a PowerPoint presentation that Gore had been giving for years, jazzed up with animation and film clips, but weighted by some treacly autobiographical segments that seem to have been left over from an Al Gore for President campaign film.

    The new Al Gore, visibly more relaxed and likable than during his last campaign, basically says this:

    Our world is habitable because some of the heat from the sun is held here by gases in the atmosphere that are descriptively labeled “greenhouse gases.” Carbon dioxide is one of the main components. Unfortunately, measurements over the past 30 years show a steep climb in carbon dioxide concentrations and happen to track closely a concurrent rise in the average temperature of the Earth. All that extra carbon dioxide, a.k.a. CO2, isn’t produced “naturally”; it’s mostly a result of mankind burning fossil fuels.

    If the profligate use of fossil fuels continues and the carbon dioxide levels keep rising, the temperature of the Earth’s atmosphere and oceans will rise to calamitous heights, melting glaciers, disturbing water systems, and causing droughts, crop failures, and much stronger hurricanes and cyclones. Gore forecasts the worst-case scenario as “a nature walk through the Book of Revelation.”
    February 2007.

    #204037 Reply
    HARDKORNATE
    Member

    But the real worst case that the once (and future?) politician presents is the breakup and melting of the two massive ice sheets that cover Greenland and Antarctica, an event that would raise global sea levels so much that many coastal areas would be under water. Using an animated seeping blue stain that’s reminiscent of how filmmakers once illustrated the progress of the Nazi regime, Gore shows large parts of San Francisco, Beijing, Shanghai and New York becoming submerged. The result, he says, will be tens of millions of “climate refugees.” It will make the upheaval caused by the flooding of New Orleans and its displaced persons seem like a walk in the park.

    There’s no way to watch An Inconvenient Truth without getting worried – at least a little worried.

    Not Bob Giegengack. He has described Al Gore’s documentary as “a political statement timed to present him as a presidential candidate in 2008.” And he added, “The glossy production is replete with inaccuracies and misrepresentations, and appeals to public fear as shamelessly as any other political statement that hopes to unite the public behind a particular ideology.” This from a guy who voted for Gore in 2000 and says he’d probably vote for him again.

    Geologists by nature and training take a long-term view. The professor clicks a slide onto the classroom screen. It reads: “In 1958, Robert Giegengack first heard about Global Warming!”

    There are a few chuckles in the classroom. Giegengack waits a beat for comic effect. “I said, ‘Big deal,’” he tells the class. “I lived in New England.”

    He’d been born in Brooklyn, but spent much of his life in New Haven. After a false start studying civil engineering at Yale, Giegengack discovered geology and got hooked. He got a master’s degree in Colorado, then returned to Yale for a doctorate and focused his research on rocks and climate change. He arrived as a young assistant professor at Penn just about the time the first Earth Day in 1970 was reflecting – and driving – an interest in the environment. Giegengack got the assignment to set up the university’s environmental studies program, which he would run for more than three decades.

    A few years ago, Giegengack told the Pennsylvania Gazette, the school’s alumni magazine, that the environmental analysis course he’s teaching today often attracts students who want to be environmental activists and carry picket signs outside the offices of the bad guys in the military-industrial complex. “But I want them to understand that these questions are enormously complex,” he went on.

    Yes, they are. I ask Gieg for a private tutorial based on the lectures he gives his students to make them consider the scientific complications of climate change. We sit one afternoon at a conference table near his office, his laptop open and the PowerPoint ready to go. Charts appear, one after another.

    Giegengack may have a personal 50-year perspective on global warming, but the time range he prefers to consult is more on the geologists’ scale. The Earth has been warming, he says, for about 20,000 years. We’ve only been collecting data on that trend for about 200 years. “For most of Earth history,” he says, “the globe has been warmer than it has been for the last 200 years. It has only rarely been cooler.” Those cooler periods have meant things like two miles of ice piled over much of what is now North America. Nothing to be nostalgic for.

    The professor hits a button on his computer, and the really long-term view appears – the past 650,000 years. In that time, the Earth’s temperature has gone through regular cycles of rise and fall. The best explanation of those cycles was conceived by a Serbian amateur scientist named Milutin Milankovi´c. Very basically, Milankovi´c said this: The Earth’s orbit around the sun is more or less circular, but when other planets align in certain ways and their gravitational forces tug at the Earth, the orbit stretches into a more elliptical shape. Combined with the tilt of the Earth on its axis as it spins, that greater or lesser distance from the sun, plus the consequent difference in solar radiation that reaches our planet, is responsible for long-term climate change.

    NOW TO THE CRUX OF THE Al Gore argument – the idea that rising carbon dioxide levels are causing an increase in temperature.

    To determine temperatures and carbon dioxide levels in the distant past, scientists rely on what they call the “proxy record.” There weren’t thermometers. So researchers drill deep down into the Antarctic ice sheet and the ocean floor and pull up core samples, whose varying chemical elements let them gauge both the CO2 levels and the temperatures of the distant past.

    Gieg clicks a button, and three charts come together. The peaks and valleys of the Milankovi´c cycles for planetary temperature align well with the ocean-floor estimates, and those match closely the records of carbon dioxide concentrations and temperature indications from ice cores. So, the professor maintains, these core samples from the polar ice and ocean floor help show that the Earth’s temperature and the levels of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere have been in lockstep for tens of thousands of years.

    Of course, that was long before anybody was burning fossil fuels. So Giegengack tells his students they might want to consider that “natural” climatic temperature cycles control carbon dioxide levels, not the other way around. That’s the crux of his argument with Gore’s view of global warming – he says carbon dioxide doesn’t control global temperature, and certainly not in a direct, linear way.

    Gieg has lots more slides to show. He points out that within his lifetime, there was a three-decade period of unusually low temperatures that culminated in the popular consciousness with the awful winter of 1976-77. Back then, scientists started sounding the alarm about a new ice age.

    Of course, it’s long been thought that the world would end either in fire or in ice. These days, the scientists are shouting fire. And in all his years around environmental issues, Giegengack has never heard so much shouting. “I don’t think we’re going to have a rational discussion of this question in the present environment,” he says. “The scientists are mad because they think nobody in Washington is listening to them. So it’s all either apocalyptic disaster or conflict of interest. If you suggest that we’re not going to hell in a handbasket because the rate of global warming is low compared to so many other environmental issues that we’re enduring, then you’re accused of being in the employ of the oil companies and you’re labeled a Republican.”

    Giegengack says things started to get this way around 1988. There was a horrifically hot summer season that year, and drought led to seemingly apocalyptic fires in Yellowstone National Park. Something in those fires was galvanizing. Al Gore, who made his first run for president in 1988, published his first environmental jeremiad, Earth in the Balance, a few years later. Around the same time, the newly formed Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change was making noise, and governments met first in Rio de Janeiro and then in Japan to forge agreements on “targets” for carbon emission cutbacks. The resulting Kyoto Protocol has been ratified by most of the countries on Earth – none of which are doing very well at actually meeting the target cutbacks – but very notably not by the United States.

    “WOW,” SAYS GIEG AS Al Gore struts onto the stage of The Oprah Winfrey Show. “He looks like he’s had Botox or something.”

    It’s afternoon in America, and Oprah is offering her millions of viewers a class with Dr. Gore that the producers are calling Global Warming 101. I’ve asked Gieg to watch it with me.

    The show turns out to be pretty much a synopsis of An Inconvenient Truth, with Gore clicking through his hyper-produced PowerPoint program and Oprah exclaiming “Wow! Wow!” with dramatic concern. To dramatize the melting of the floating ice cap at the North Pole, Gore has inserted an animated clip of a polar bear swimming desperately to a tiny ice floe that isn’t strong enough to hold him. Global warming is drowning helpless bears. Oprah thinks it’s the coolest and saddest thing in Gore’s whole movie. Gieg starts shouting:

    “We don’t know that. We don’t know that! We don’t know that polar bears haven’t drowned in every interglacial period. Nobody was watching them back then.”

    It’s got to be a frustrating experience, seeing a topic you’ve spent some 50 years studying turned into an Oprah episode. “I like her,” Gieg says. “She’d beat Al Gore if she ran for president.”

    Then Gore clicks again to dramatic footage of a collapsing polar ice shelf. “That’s irresponsible,” Gieg says. “What he’s doing is no less than the scare tactics used by people like Karl Rove.”

    Oprah says she had no idea all these terrible things were happening until she interviewed the noted authority Leonardo DiCaprio. Gore is now into his segment on the melting of glaciers and the possibility of catastrophe if Greenland goes, or parts of Antarctica. The deadly blue water seeping over the world’s great lowland cities comes onto the screen.

    “Sea level is rising,” Giegengack agrees, switching off the sound. But, he explains, it’s been rising ever since warming set in 18,000 years ago. The rate of rise has been pretty slow – only about 400 feet so far. And recently – meaning in the thousands of years – the rate has slowed even more. The Earth’s global ocean level is only going up 1.8 millimeters per year. That’s less than the thickness of one nickel. For the catastrophe of flooded cities and millions of refugees that Gore envisions, sea levels would have to rise about 20 feet.

    “At the present rate of sea-level rise,” Gieg says, “it’s going to take 3,500 years to get up there. So if for some reason this warming process that melts ice is cutting loose and accelerating, sea level doesn’t know it. And sea level, we think, is the best indicator of global warming.”

    By now, Al Gore is taking Oprah on an anti-global-warming shopping trip, buying compact fluorescent light bulbs and programmable thermostats.

    We should all buy those things, the professor says, but he’s had just about enough of Dr. Gore. “See,” Gieg says, “the thing he doesn’t mention is that there are 2.4 billion people in India and China who have launched a campaign that will increase their energy consumption by a factor of 10. No matter what we do. If we somehow cut our CO2 emissions in half, you wouldn’t be able to measure the difference because of the role played by India and China.

    “It’s over. If CO2 is the problem, we’ve already lost.”

    When Gieg gets to this point in his argument, as he often does when talking about global warming, he gets a little frustrated. “I always get sidetracked because, first of all, the science isn’t good. Second, there are all these other interpretations for what we see. Third, it doesn’t make any difference, and fourth, it’s distracting us from environmental problems that really matter.” Among those, Gieg says, are the millions of people a year who die from smoking and two million people a year who die because they don’t have access to clean water.

    Bob Giegengack likes to point out that there was a time when people like him were called natural philosophers, and he wouldn’t mind a return to the days when scientists spent more time asking questions and less time testifying before committees.

    But that won’t happen soon. Now that Democrats run Congress again, they’re likely to ramp up the hearings to chide the Republicans for what they see as nearly a decade of stonewalling and misinformation on global warming. After all, the outgoing chairman of the Senate Committee on the Environment, Oklahoma Republican James Inhofe, ignited a wildfire in the groves of environmentalism when he called the idea of catastrophic global warming a “hoax.”

    Movie stars will continue to move in on the action. And look for Al Gore to keep rolling along as the Energizer Bunny of global warming, beating his drum incessantly, powered by a carbon-neutral battery.

    In the long view, a geologist like Giegengack can take some comfort in, well, the long view. “There’s all this stuff about saving the planet,” he says. “The Earth is fine. The Earth was fine before we got here, and it’ll be fine long after we’re gone.”

    That will probably be on the final.

    John Marchese is a contributing writer. His book The Violin Maker: Finding a Centuries-Old Tradition in a Brooklyn Workshop will be published in the spring.

    Originally published in Philadelphia Magazine,

    #204038 Reply
    Robyo
    Participant

    Thanks for the article, Nate.  😉

    If CO2 emissions really are causing increased greenhouse effect (and it's still not proven they are), then our cars are but a very small part of the problem… What about wars in the middle-east where there are no environmental regulations on any military vehicles and weapons? What about the millions of factories all over the world spewing pollution into the air?
    Oh yeah, Hier Bush killed the clean water/air acts of the 70's… Of course, WE will be the ones who are forced to pay extra taxes and give up or rights to help save the planet while the powers that be continue their greedy destruction of Mother Gaia…

    @ Roboto, I agree that the trance scene really needs to wake up on environmental and political issues. There's a lot of asleep people in this world that desperately need waking up. I mean, WW III is right at our doorstep! All the bastards need is another fabrication of truth or another false-flag terrorist action (caused by our government, most likely, like 9/11) and we'll be bombing Iran tomarrow. Unfortunately, most trancers would rather ignore the problem, focused on their trips or some supposed consciousness elevation. Well, evolution can't continue if we're all slaves for the police state!

    I once heard a dude say that the anti-war movement of the 60's would never have ignited if not for the gift of LSD. Apparently, it's difficult to digest a war when you're on psychadelics.. So why isn't there a rabid anti-war movement happening today? Well, there is, but you certainly won't hear about it in the corporately-controlled media. People, we should be mad as hell right now.

    I seriously hope at future parties we can continue to have forums and workshops that JeffZ helped to organize. We need to continue the dialogue and go into action!

    Sorry for being on a soapbox, but these are issues I am very passionate about.

    #204039 Reply
    Mr. Roboto
    Guest

    I realize now that between the drinks and the movie I got a little over excited.  I also realize that global warming is very possible right now.  There are many signs that it could be happening. 

    The documentary also addresses issuses on war, poverty, etc.  I still would recomend it to anyone that has a passion for evironmental issues.  If you can watch it open minded that Gore is not a politician but an educator, you seem to get a vibe that he is genuine.  Maybe that's his politcal savy but it got me to listen. 

    And Robyo, no need to apologize for speaking out.  I respect that and glad to here that I'm not the only one who is willing ot speak out.  My issue is really implimenting things into my life to make a difference.  Talk is cheap! 

    If anyone organizes workshops this year for these issues, I will def be in attendence. 😉

    #204040 Reply
    Veck93
    Member

    I once heard a dude say that the anti-war movement of the 60's would never have ignited if not for the gift of LSD. Apparently, it's difficult to digest a war when you're on psychadelics.. So why isn't there a rabid anti-war movement happening today? Well, there is, but you certainly won't hear about it in the corporately-controlled media. People, we should be mad as hell right now. There are sadistic criminals running our country and killing in your name!

    I seriously hope at future parties we can continue to have forums and workshops that JeffZ helped to so brilliantly engineer. We need to continue the dialogue and go into action!

    Sorry for being on a soapbox, but these are issues I am very passionate about.

    An alternative is the IndyMedia. It's nationwide still. Some years ago the FBI tried to mess with them during a G8 conference, trashing the home office and servers, I think it was out in Seattle at the time. But they survive. It's community written so quality varies but a lot of detail on stories big media wont touch or fluff over. A couple years ago during the bloody G8 conference in Genoa Italy there were real time reports from Starhawk and others during the bloody attack on sleeping protestors in a local school and the subsequent trashing of computers in the alternative media center across the street. There's been coverage of all the local protests and ost of the strikes including pictures. The Chicago center is at chicago.indymedia.org. There are chapters all over the world you can check on from the main page.

    #204041 Reply
    Robyo
    Participant

    Indymedia is cool. We tried getting one going in Rockford, but people don't have a clue out here…
    I remember it being more of a presence when I lived on the West coast.
    It was a WTO meeting in Seattle in '99 that ended up in riots and yeah, the police trashed the indymedia there, but not before a whole lot of people taped the event.  🙂
    I remember hearing about the G8 thing in Italy where some people died.

    But since then, we've been in two wars and likely to start another one soon… Why aren't more people pissed and being active? Zombified by television?
    A big problem started when the FCC changed the rules in the 90's on how many media outlets a corporation can own. Now we have serious consolidation of media by only a handful of people…
    At least the internet is awesome for getting the word out…for now.

    #204042 Reply
    Veck93
    Member

    Indymedia is cool. We tried getting one going in Rockford, but people don't have a clue out here…
    I remember it being more of a presence when I lived on the West coast.
    It was a WTO meeting in Seattle in '99 that ended up in riots and yeah, the police trashed the indymedia there, but not before a whole lot of people taped the event.  🙂
    I remember hearing about the G8 thing in Italy where some people died.
    But since then, we've been in two wars and likely to start another one soon… Why aren't more people pissed and being active? Zombified by television?
    A big problem started when the FCC changed the rules in the 90's on how many media outlets a corporation can own. Now we have serious consolidation of media by only a handful of people…
    At least the internet is awesome for getting the word out…for now.

    #204043 Reply
    Veck93
    Member

    Indymedia is cool. We tried getting one going in Rockford, but people don't have a clue out here…
    I remember it being more of a presence when I lived on the West coast.
    It was a WTO meeting in Seattle in '99 that ended up in riots and yeah, the police trashed the indymedia there, but not before a whole lot of people taped the event.  🙂
    I remember hearing about the G8 thing in Italy where some people died.

    But since then, we've been in two wars and likely to start another one soon… Why aren't more people pissed and being active? Zombified by television?
    A big problem started when the FCC changed the rules in the 90's on how many media outlets a corporation can own. Now we have serious consolidation of media by only a handful of people…
    At least the internet is awesome for getting the word out…for now.

    Yeah, I didnt think G8 sounded right for Seattle. yeah that was WTO. The G8 in Genoa was very bloody. It was later proved that police were posing as Black Bloc to give uniformed police reason to attack the crowd indescriminately. One protestor was shot dead and his body run over twice by a police vehicle.  Protestors staying in a school were beaten in their sleeping bags then the media center across the street was attacked, much of this reported in real time on IndyMedia by Starhawk.
    anyway, dont mean to get on a soapbox. I can get emotional over that kind of stuff. Please don't ever mention Kent State to me during May.
    As relates to this forum you make a couple good points. The media is under tighter and tighter control. Forums like this and word of mouth among and between communities is vital if we are to stay informed. BUT those outlets are at risk. The internet is under constant threat by various govenments and carriers. We cannot take it for granted. So the community ties themselves become more critical.
    Why do people seem so apathetic? You say the same as we did in the late 60's. But the trancers who dont get involved are still opting out of buying into the system. They are, as Che said, the ocean we swim in.
    Growing consciousness is also an aid not an escape. Who with growing consciousness can continue their life without being kinder to Mother Earth? Without being at least nominally opposed to war.
    And are there really not a lot of people who do care? There's the alst election if you believe in those kind of things. And remember media and police figures are usually 1/4 to 1/2 the reality. Last years invasion anniversary so called protest was a joke and we still had at least 20,000 people in the street and staying in the plaza untilt he police swept it. (I had a lot of fun taking pictures of the police who were taking pictures of us) Previously there were up to 100,000 Chicagoans in the street including hundreds of anarchists that weren't taking much crap. There have been petitions of hundreds of thousands, etc etc. We can argue tactics but I think folks are as awake as they were in the 60's. But, yeah, control of the media hurts big time. Daily life being as stressful as it is for most people takes a toll on activism too. They coopted us then and they will do their best to do it now. All I can say is keep your communities tight.
    Look forward to talking to you some day between trances…

    #204044 Reply
    Robyo
    Participant

    The media is under tighter and tighter control. Forums like this and word of mouth among and between communities is vital if we are to stay informed. BUT those outlets are at risk. The internet is under constant threat by various govenments and carriers. We cannot take it for granted. So the community ties themselves become more critical.
    Why do people seem so apathetic? You say the same as we did in the late 60's. But the trancers who dont get involved are still opting out of buying into the system. They are, as Che said, the ocean we swim in.
    Growing consciousness is also an aid not an escape. Who with growing consciousness can continue their life without being kinder to Mother Earth? Without being at least nominally opposed to war.
    And are there really not a lot of people who do care? There's the alst election if you believe in those kind of things. And remember media and police figures are usually 1/4 to 1/2 the reality. Last years invasion anniversary so called protest was a joke and we still had at least 20,000 people in the street and staying in the plaza untilt he police swept it. (I had a lot of fun taking pictures of the police who were taking pictures of us) Previously there were up to 100,000 Chicagoans in the street including hundreds of anarchists that weren't taking much crap. There have been petitions of hundreds of thousands, etc etc. We can argue tactics but I think folks are as awake as they were in the 60's. But, yeah, control of the media hurts big time. Daily life being as stressful as it is for most people takes a toll on activism too. They coopted us then and they will do their best to do it now. All I can say is keep your communities tight.
    Look forward to talking to you some day between trances…

    Awesome, Veck. Lots of good points. I just think it would be cool if there was more awareness of issues at trance gatherings.  Maybe a table set up with literature or something. I'm not saying it's neccessary to ram issues down peoples throats, but to totally ignore them isn't helping either… Psytrance and electronic music in general already has an escapist quality to it.
    What we really need is more protests in the streets regularly. Turn them into street parties if you like, but get the people out talking and active in their communities. Sure, they will be ignored byt the mainstream media, but I'm sure you've heard the saying, “the revolution will not be televised.” It will be so cool when trance is played regularly in the streets of America. Dancing in the streets!  ;D

    #204045 Reply
    Eklypz
    Member

    Going to washington most likely March 17 to protest stuff 🙂 Hop on da bus in your town! http://www.marchonpentagon.org

    #204046 Reply
    Robyo
    Participant

    Going to washington most likely March 17 to protest stuff 🙂 Hop on da bus in your town! http://www.marchonpentagon.org

    awesome!
    Unfortunately, I'll be in North Dakota then…

    #204047 Reply
    Veck93
    Member

    Awesome, Veck. Lots of good points. I just think it would be cool if there was more awareness of issues at trance gatherings.  Maybe a table set up with literature or something. I'm not saying it's neccessary to ram issues down peoples throats, but to totally ignore them isn't helping either… Psytrance and electronic music in general already has an escapist quality to it.
    What we really need is more protests in the streets regularly. Turn them into street parties if you like, but get the people out talking and active in their communities. Sure, they will be ignored byt the mainstream media, but I'm sure you've heard the saying, “the revolution will not be televised.” It will be so cool when trance is played regularly in the streets of America. Dancing in the streets!  ;D

    Robyo – if you're into protesting the war, there's a lot about to happen around town…will post later with some options near you!…but that's hardly the only issue going. How many people here have great health insurance? If you do, can you cover the COBRA costs if you lose your job? I'm all for fiscal responsibility but what Stroger is doing to sacrifice Cook Cty health care while keeping 2, that's TWO public relations departments and other highly paid administrators. There have been a number of protests, petitions, etc and will be more as nurses are laid off and clinics closed. Any of us may be laying in the aisles at the hospital crying for help someday.
    And then Earth Day is coming too…
    BUT THAT'S NOT WHAT I'M WRITING ABOUT TODAY.
    Wondering…next time up at Black River Falls…why not gather up some fliers from various groups and just do it. If Chilluminati doesn't want to be directly involved, if someone will bring a table, I'll maintain it (like cover it if it rains) at my campsite. We were at the corner on the hill with the skeleton last time but this time we are probably bringing a whole 10 x 10 portable ceremonial magick style temple (I'm in BOTA and wife is in EOGD) just for kicks and because she sewed the darned thing and we've only taken it out once to the Starwood festival in NY. We can set something up next to that so it will be visible.
    I'm thinking this should move to another part of the forum. I think there's a section for networking or something.

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 15 total)
Reply To: Reply #204034 in An Inconvenient Truth
Your information:




To top